foreclosure fraud pt 1

by Tony on July 5, 2009

In my backyard garden talking about the courts threatening to allow the banks to unlawfully hijack my family legacy and they usually use a Sheriff, ,,, (who are supposed to protect ordinary folks from big corporate criminals who steal our family’s labor, and sell our childrens futures to foreign entities who are impersonating a de-jure representative government of the unanimous majority,,,, or was that only 51% of them telling the other 49 that they can steal your land if the ‘majority …

Share and Enjoy:
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. California Loan Modification Fraud Lawyer & Foreclosure Consultant Fraud Attorney – Damages For Scams, Ripoffs, Frauds And Statutory Violations
  2. foreclosure fraud pt 2- read update info
  3. Land Foreclosure

Read the full article...

{ 25 comments }

1 dgl1962 May 16, 2009 at 8:41 am

Right,you can just run out and get an “allodial” title for your property which even avoids property taxes…
You’re doing a disservice to people here that wish to obtain workable information.

2 impalapez May 16, 2009 at 10:16 am

It’s not so much “land claims” as it is Maritime/Admiralty law of the sea, applied to the land….that is why, it’s alleged, that the revolutionary war happened….

3 crapese May 18, 2009 at 10:01 am

The question remains, “did she receive money ” yes or no. Using your arguement, no one should buy US Treasury Bills, they are created the same way, however they are they sold to investors for real cash. Are you telling me that she is not responsible for the debt? If so, there is a clear message to investors, don’t buy any US debt instruments whatsoever. By the way, no more credit to her period.

4 nesNYC May 18, 2009 at 12:41 pm

No. She did not received “money” in the constitutional sense. Why? Because the Federal reserve system is fraudulent and unconstitutional. “Real cash” is fiat debt.

Why does that play into this situation? Simple, if there was no consideration for the loan, then no loan was made under current backing regulations. When she signed the mortgage note, it then became an asset to the “lender” and they got cash for it. In essence she financed the loan, not the “lender”.

See:
watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

5 nesNYC May 18, 2009 at 12:51 pm

The FED was instituted to control boom and bust cycles AND help the dollar retain its value. What has happened in the 96 years since its inception is that we’ve had one depression and multiple harmful recessions with the dollar loosing 90% of its value.

When you sign the dotted line on the mortgage, you’re not paying the property value, youre paying the lost value of the dollar through inflation and you have to do real labor to cover that. Inflation and banking trickery are the real crimes.

6 marshallone May 19, 2009 at 10:44 am

Yep, you use the private property of a private bank (Federal Reserve Notes) and you get to pay a fee in the form on income tax. You consented/contracted with the Federal Reserve and they collect via the IRS. Its all commercial, maritime contracts in commerce.

7 impalapez May 19, 2009 at 10:45 am

Glad to see someone else on the youtube is aware of it….
Peace

8 marshallone May 19, 2009 at 10:46 am

No, she did not receive money. That is the point!!

9 Signzit May 19, 2009 at 3:16 pm

this is completely correct. thanks you for your efforts to help people learn.

The bank has no vested interest in any property. It was not the Bank’s “Action” that created this loan. They did not take Deposits and give her FRNs.

They are only Agents for this Human who created this credit!

She is the “Sponsor of the Credit” I hope she Is “Charged” in this capacity, and has her lien in place, “FIRST IN LINE, FIRST IN TIME” Please be the “Secured Party”!!!! Up-loader?

10 Signzit May 19, 2009 at 3:25 pm

What do you mean? Do you mean to say the UCC1 lien process is not open low class people & that this common practice of commerce is only for Those special chosen few?

What are you saying. Your pitch for the BLM is sweet but why?

You clearly do not understand what your are saying, as “Charged” & the “Secured Party” she may add anything to the private side of commerce and avoid any and all property taxes. As they are codes only, and codes apply to those that give consent! She is a human, I hope

11 Signzit May 19, 2009 at 3:37 pm

HJR 192 SAYS there is no way to pay any thing. only discharge!

Discharge is what she is trying to do. you all are equal under the law. NOT CODE. As a Human Lawfully UN-able to pay her Debt she must Discharge it.

The same could be accomplished by offering the Bank Lawful Money (gold or silver), as AGENTS they would have to Refuse this LAWFUL money and accept the OFFER “Itself”, to pay in Gold as Just compensation. Or ACCEPT FOR VALUE! Discharged.

12 dgl1962 May 19, 2009 at 4:14 pm

I’m a 46 year old simpleton who’s bought and sold 8 homes the last twenty years.
Please explain how she can avoid paying property taxes-no mish mash,wishy washy,he said,she said,my friend is a lawyer stuff-give me a speciific way that can happen without the county owning your property in a few months after default.

13 OldManInHisUnderwear May 19, 2009 at 5:44 pm

Hope you can kick their collective asses!

14 marshallone May 19, 2009 at 9:35 pm

Its called Lawfull money and the Law of the land, the Constitution, thats how, read it yourself. HINT: its the part that says “no state shall make…” how can a Judge, sworn to uphold the Constitutions MAKE anyone pay in anything but Gold and silver coin? THEY CANT if you make them take Judicial notice, on the record of their oath to defend the Consititution. You can take it from there, with study.

15 dgl1962 May 20, 2009 at 11:35 am

Ok,so those homeowners must now give the bank a pile of “gold and silver coins” if they wish to remain in those homes and call them their rightful property.

16 marshallone May 20, 2009 at 10:43 pm

Nope, they just need to forgive the DEBT owed to them by the banks. The signor on the NOTE is the Creditor, not the bank, they are the DEBTOR. We make the currency with our signature. You owe them nothing cause they never gave you anything. They owe YOU. That is why they call it YOUR LOAN!

17 dgl1962 May 21, 2009 at 12:48 am

Nope,If I “sign” my name on a “loan” whereby the “banking institution” gives me100,000 DOLLARS CASH AGAINST MY EQUITY,OR MY CREDITWORTHYNESS,I didn’t “create” the money,THEY GAVE IT TO ME,irrespective of whether they printed the “money” in their basement,stole it or had it created out of thin air with majic from the federal reserve-YOU OWE THEM FOR THAT 100k for which you happily bought lots of little trinkets like,boats,cars,alcohol,hookers,guns and ammo-you gotta pay them back.

18 marshallone May 21, 2009 at 8:42 am

No, you are ignorant to what money is. Read the uS Constitution and then get back to us when you know the facts. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Good day to you, enjoy your peonage, you deserve ecactly what you are going to get. Peace and love to you and yours.

19 dgl1962 May 21, 2009 at 11:15 am

Try this,if you have a home and if you have any equity,get a loan against the equity(in those dollars that aren’t really money as you claim) and then when the payments are due,tell the loan company of this creative way of getting out of your debts and see how long you’ll be able to stay in your home and if you ever get clear title to borrow against it or sell it in the future.
I’ve known that our money was to be only gold and silver long before you have,but this is the current system.

20 marshallone May 21, 2009 at 11:45 am

It is the de facto system, but still against the Law. Sorry, I have kept 3 houses out of foreclosure this way, so my ‘claims’ are factual. The promissory note created the funds, which were then sold. If they cannot produce the original debt insturment , there is no debt. If they can, the insturment itself is proof of payment. They did not loan you the money, you loaned it to them. And how the hell do you know you have known anything longer then I? Methinks you cannot prove your claim. I can.

21 crapese May 21, 2009 at 2:19 pm

If she did not receive money (that she has spent either to buy the home or taken equity out for other reasons) then why did she sign a mortgage document in the first place? Does she have cancelled cheques/bank withdrawal notices that prove she has repaid the loan? yes or no?

22 LawProfessor1971 May 26, 2009 at 6:37 pm

Good Girlfriend, why give them anything?
its all about them using our credits?
You have to know your position in law and status also. Keep us posted Also :)

23 superpencil007 May 30, 2009 at 3:18 am

Keep fighting them, Star Family Hill !

24 noladol June 4, 2009 at 8:06 pm

You go girl!

25 wwood14 June 4, 2009 at 10:58 pm

What’s the best book to read on the Acceptance for value process??

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Next foreclosure wave is in view – Los Angeles Times

Next post: Foreclosure Is Latest Challenge for Knicks' Curry – New York Times