Comments on: foreclosure fraud pt 1

By: wwood14

wwood14 — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 05:58:42 +0000

What’s the best book to read on the Acceptance for value process??

By: noladol

noladol — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:06:44 +0000

You go girl!

By: superpencil007

superpencil007 — Sat, 30 May 2009 10:18:22 +0000

Keep fighting them, Star Family Hill !

By: LawProfessor1971

LawProfessor1971 — Wed, 27 May 2009 01:37:44 +0000

Good Girlfriend, why give them anything?
its all about them using our credits?
You have to know your position in law and status also. Keep us posted Also :)

By: crapese

crapese — Thu, 21 May 2009 21:19:49 +0000

If she did not receive money (that she has spent either to buy the home or taken equity out for other reasons) then why did she sign a mortgage document in the first place? Does she have cancelled cheques/bank withdrawal notices that prove she has repaid the loan? yes or no?

By: marshallone

marshallone — Thu, 21 May 2009 18:45:20 +0000

It is the de facto system, but still against the Law. Sorry, I have kept 3 houses out of foreclosure this way, so my ‘claims’ are factual. The promissory note created the funds, which were then sold. If they cannot produce the original debt insturment , there is no debt. If they can, the insturment itself is proof of payment. They did not loan you the money, you loaned it to them. And how the hell do you know you have known anything longer then I? Methinks you cannot prove your claim. I can.

By: dgl1962

dgl1962 — Thu, 21 May 2009 18:15:47 +0000

Try this,if you have a home and if you have any equity,get a loan against the equity(in those dollars that aren’t really money as you claim) and then when the payments are due,tell the loan company of this creative way of getting out of your debts and see how long you’ll be able to stay in your home and if you ever get clear title to borrow against it or sell it in the future.
I’ve known that our money was to be only gold and silver long before you have,but this is the current system.

By: marshallone

marshallone — Thu, 21 May 2009 15:42:40 +0000

No, you are ignorant to what money is. Read the uS Constitution and then get back to us when you know the facts. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Good day to you, enjoy your peonage, you deserve ecactly what you are going to get. Peace and love to you and yours.

By: dgl1962

dgl1962 — Thu, 21 May 2009 07:48:56 +0000

Nope,If I “sign” my name on a “loan” whereby the “banking institution” gives me100,000 DOLLARS CASH AGAINST MY EQUITY,OR MY CREDITWORTHYNESS,I didn’t “create” the money,THEY GAVE IT TO ME,irrespective of whether they printed the “money” in their basement,stole it or had it created out of thin air with majic from the federal reserve-YOU OWE THEM FOR THAT 100k for which you happily bought lots of little trinkets like,boats,cars,alcohol,hookers,guns and ammo-you gotta pay them back.

By: marshallone

marshallone — Thu, 21 May 2009 05:43:25 +0000

Nope, they just need to forgive the DEBT owed to them by the banks. The signor on the NOTE is the Creditor, not the bank, they are the DEBTOR. We make the currency with our signature. You owe them nothing cause they never gave you anything. They owe YOU. That is why they call it YOUR LOAN!